Apple 5W USB Power Adapter Charger Compatible with Apple devices: iPhone, iPod MD813ZM/A (B)
Apple 5W USB Power Adapter. the following detailed information will help you select the right product for your needs and buy in the Conrad Online Shop:With this significantly compact and convenient USB adapter you can charge your iPhone or iPod: at …
Apple 5W USB Power Adapter. the following detailed information will help you select the right product for your needs and buy in the Conrad Online Shop:With this significantly compact and convenient USB adapter you can charge your iPhone or iPod: at …
Apple 5W USB Power Adapter. the following detailed information will help you select the right product for your needs and buy in the Conrad Online Shop:
With this significantly compact and convenient USB adapter you can charge your iPhone or iPod: at home, in transit or whenever any computer connection.
This power supply in a new and very compact design enables fast and efficient charging. at home, in the office or on the road. It can be used for any iPhone and all iPod models with dock or lightning connection can be used.
This text is machine translated.
- For charging for iPhone or iPod if no computer connection is availableEnables fast and efficient chargingB-goods (damaged or missing packaging)
Don’t Throw Away Your iPhone Charger—Here’s What The USB-C Change Means
Apple on Tuesday officially acknowledged it plans to switch over to a USB-C charging port on future iPhones to comply with new EU regulations, but most iPhone owners will not have to ditch their existing chargers when the change finally goes into effect—here’s why.
Since the iPhone 12, users have been forced to purchase their chargers separately as they are no longer included in the box—which Apple claims is part of its effort to cut back on e-waste.
Despite featuring the proprietary lightning port, iPhones and all Apple-made chargers already use the industry standard USB-Power Delivery spec, which means existing chargers will work perfectly fine with the upcoming USB-C iPhone.
The only thing buyers of these new iPhones will have to swap out is the cable that connects the charger to the phone, something Apple usually includes in the box.
Apple’s global marketing chief Greg Joswiak acknowledged this by stating the company’s modern chargers come with detachable cables that can easily be replaced based on what device is being charged.
This is something anyone who owns an iPhone and a newer iPad model can already see as the same charger can be used for different devices by just swapping a single cable.
While old chargers will still work just fine, other peripherals like docks, dongles, and attachable devices like controllers are likely to be rendered useless as the lightning plugs on these devices are non-removable. Bizarrely, this switch to USB-C may allow some peripherals designed for Android devices to become compatible with the new iPhone while old iPhone-compatible accessories won’t work.
In the early 2010s, Apple’s frequent changes to its MacBook charging ports became a subject of major annoyance for many of its customers and has even been the subject of internet parodies. Apple reintroduced the magnetic Magsafe chargers on its newest line of Macbooks but like with the iPhone, modern MacBook chargers also come with detachable cables and also retain support for charging via USB-C.
Speaking at the Wall Street Journal’s Tech Live event on Tuesday evening, Joswiak said Apple will “obviously…have to comply” with the new EU regulation on USB-C chargers for all new smartphones sold from 2024 adding “we’ve no choice.” Joswiak, however, expressed his displeasure about Apple being forced to adopt the standard saying the company is open to governments telling them what they want to accomplish with a regulation instead of mandating one.
“Over a billion people,” across the world have cables with the lightning connector, Joswiak said on Tuesday, warning that many of these cables are now in danger of becoming e-waste due to the EU’s legislative actions.
Ken Shirriff’s blog
When you buy a USB charger, how do you know if you’re getting a safe, high-quality charger for your money? You can’t tell from the outside if a charger provides silky-smooth power or if it is a dangerous charger that emits noisy power that cause touchscreen malfunctions and could self-destruct. In this article, I carefully measure the performance of a dozen different chargers, rate their performance in multiple categories, and determine the winners and losers.
The above picture shows the twelve chargers I analyzed. The charger in the upper-left is the cube-shaped Apple iPhone charger. Next is an oblong Samsung adapter and a cube Samsung adapter. The Apple iPad power adapter is substantially larger than the iPhone charger but provides twice the power. The HP TouchPad power charger has an unusual cylindrical shape. Next is a counterfeit iPhone charger, which appears identical to the real thing but only costs a couple dollars. In the upper right, the Monoprice iPhone charger has a 30-pin dock connector, not USB. The colorful orange charger is a counterfeit of the Apple UK iPhone charger. Next is a counterfeit iPad charger that looks just like the real one. The Belkin power adapter is oval shaped. The KMS power supply provides four USB ports. The final charger is a Motorola Charger.
Summary of ratings
The chargers are rated from 1 to 5 energy bolts, with 5 bolts the best. The overall rating below is the average of the ratings in nine different categories, based on my measurements of efficiency, power stability, power quality, and power output. The quick summary is that phone manufacturers provide pretty good chargers, the aftermarket chargers are worse, and 2 counterfeit chargers are pretty much junk. Much to my surprise, the HP TouchPad charger (which isn’t sold any more) turned out to have the best overall score. The counterfeit iPhone charger set a new low for bad quality, strikingly worse than the other two counterfeits.
|Samsung travel adapter ETA0U60JBE|
|Samsung travel adapter ETA0U80JBE|
|Apple 10W USB Power Adapter A1357|
|Hewlett Packard LPS AC/DC Adaptor P/N 157-10157-00|
|Fake Apple A1265 “Designed by California”|
|Monoprice Switching Mode Power Supply MIPTC1A|
|Fake Apple A1299|
|Fake Apple 10W USB Power Adapter A1357|
|Motorola AC Power Supply DC4050US0301|
Inside a charger
These chargers cram a lot of complex circuitry into a small package, as you can see from the iPhone charger below. (See my iPhone charger teardown for more details.) The small size makes it challenging to make an efficient, high-quality charger, while the commoditization of chargers and the demand for low pressure manufacturers to make the circuit as simple as possible and exclude expensive components, even if the power quality is worse. The result is a wide variation in the quality of the chargers, most of which is invisible to the user, who may believe “a charger is a charger”.
Internally a charger is an amazingly compact switching power supply that efficiently converts line AC into 5 volt DC output. The input AC is first converted to high-voltage DC. The DC is chopped up tens of thousands of times a second and fed into a tiny flyback transformer. The output of the transformer is converted to low-voltage DC, filtered, and provided as the 5 volt output through the USB port. A feedback mechanism regulates the chopping frequency to keep the output voltage stable. Name-brand chargers use a specialized control IC to run the charger, while cheap chargers cut corners by replacing the IC with a cheap, low-quality feedback circuit.
A poor design can suffer several problems. If the output voltage is not filtered well, there will be noise and spikes due to the high-frequency switching. At extreme levels this could damage your phone, but the most common symptom is the touchscreen doesn’t work while the charger is plugged in. A second problem is the output voltage can be affected by the AC input, causing 120 Hz “ripple”. Third, the charger is supposed to provide a constant voltage. A poor design can cause the voltage to sag as the load increases. Your phone will take longer to charge if the charger doesn’t provide enough power. Finally, USB chargers are not all interchangeable; the wrong type of charger may not work with your device.
Counterfeit chargers pose a safety hazard as well as a hazard to your phone. You can buy a charger that looks just like an Apple charger for about 2, but the charger is nothing like an Apple charger internally. The power is extremely bad quality (as I will show below). But more importantly, these chargers ignore safety standards. Since chargers have hundreds of volts internally, there’s a big risk if a charger doesn’t have proper insulation. You’re putting your phone, and more importantly yourself, at risk if you use one of these chargers. I did a teardown of a counterfeit charger, which shows the differences in detail.
I’ve taken apart several counterfeit chargers and readers have sent me photos of others. Surprisingly, the counterfeit chargers I’ve examined all use different circuitry internally. If you get a counterfeit, it could be worse or better than what I’ve seen.
How do you tell if a charger is counterfeit? The fakes are very similar; it’s hard for me to tell, even after studying many chargers. There’s a video on how to distinguish real and fake chargers through subtle differences. You can also weigh the charger (if you have an accurate scale), and compare with the weights I give above. The easiest way to get a genuine Apple charger is fork over 29 to an Apple store. If you buy a 2 “Original Genuine Apple” charger on eBay shipped from China, I can guarantee it’s counterfeit. On the other hand, I’ve succeeded in buying genuine used chargers from US resellers for a moderate price on eBay, but you’re taking a chance.
The following picture shows a counterfeit charger that burned up. The safety issues with counterfeits are not just theoretical; when hundreds of volts short out, the results can be spectacular.
Indicated charger type
A device being charged can detect what type of charger is being used through specific voltages on the USB data pins. Because of this, some devices only work with their own special chargers. For instance, an “incorrect” charger may be rejected by an iPhone 3GS or later with the message “Charging is not supported with this accessory”.
There are many different charger types, but only a few are used in the chargers I examined. A USB charger that follows the standard is known as a “dedicated USB charger”. However, some manufacturers (such as Apple, Sony, and HP) don’t follow the USB standard but implement their own proprietary charger types. Apple has separate charger types for 1 amp (iPhone) and 2 amp (iPad) chargers. HP has a special type for the HP TouchPad.
The point is that USB chargers are not interchangeable, and devices may not work if the charger type doesn’t match what the device expects. The table below shows the type of charger, the current that the label claims the charger provides, the current it actually provides, and the charger type it indicates to the device.
The types of the counterfeit chargers are a mess, as they advertise one power level, actually supply a different power level, and have the charger type for a third level. For example, the counterfeit iPhone charger is advertised as supplying 1 amp, but has the 2A charger type, so an iPad will expect 2 amps but not obtain enough power. On the other hand, the counterfeit iPad charger claims to supply 2 amps, but really only supplies 1 amp and has a 1A type.
|Apple 1A charger||5V 1A||1.79A||23.0g|
|dedicated USB charger||5V 0.7A||.80A||33.1g|
|dedicated USB charger||5V 1A||1.17A||23.2g|
|Apple 2A charger||5.1V 2.1A||2.3A||67.5G|
|HP TouchPad charger||5.3V 2.0A||2.4A||54.8g|
|Apple 2A charger||5V 1A||.94A||18.8g|
|Apple dock||5V 1A||1.22A||67.8g|
|dedicated USB charger||5V 1A||.57A||29.4g|
|Apple 1A charger||5.1V 2.1A||1.2A||43.4g|
|Apple 1A charger||5V 1A||1.27A||43.0g|
|Apple 2A charger||5V 2.1A||3.4A||99.5G|
|dedicated USB charger||5.1V.85A||.82A||38.6g|
People often wonder how much power their charger is wasting while it’s idle, and if they should unplug their charger when not in use. I measured this “vampire” power usage and found the chargers varied by more than a factor of 20 in their idle power usage. The Samsung oblong charger came in best, using just 19 mW; this was so low compared to the other chargers that I measured it again a different way to make sure I hadn’t made an error. On the other extreme, the fake iPhone charger used 375 mW. The Apple iPhone charger performed surprisingly badly at 195 mW. If plugged in for a year, this would cost you about 21 cents in electricity, so it’s probably not worth worrying about. In the following table, I use the official charger Star Rating System (yes, there actually is such a thing).
I also measured efficiency of the chargers under load. One of the benefits of switching power supplies over simpler linear supplies is they are much more efficient at converting the input power to output. The chargers I measured all did pretty well, with 63% to 80% efficiency. The HP charger was the winner here.
The chargers up close
Apple iPhone and counterfeit
The above photo shows a real iPhone charger (left) and a counterfeit (right); the two chargers are almost identical, down to the green dot. If you look closely, the genuine one says “Designed by Apple in California”, while the counterfeit has the puzzling text “Designed by California”. The counterfeit also removed the “Apple Japan” text below the plug. I’ve seen another counterfeit that says “Designed by Abble” (not Apple). I assume the word “Apple” is removed for legal or trademark reasons, since the word “Apple” is often (but not always) missing from counterfeits.
I call this charger the Samsung oblong charger, to distinguish it from the Samsung cube charger.
Apple 12W Power Adapter Original with Box
The Samsung cube charger is shaped very similarly to the Apple iPhone charger. Internally, however, it turns out to be entirely different.
Apple iPad and counterfeit
The photo above shows a real iPad charger (left) and a counterfeit (right). The counterfeit has almost identical text, but without “Designed by Apple in California. Assembled in China”, “Listed” under UL, and the manufacturer “Foxlink”. Inexplicably this sanitization left “TM and © 2010 Apple Inc”.
The above photo shows a real iPad charger on the left and a fake iPad charger on the right, with the plug removed. The most visible difference is the real charger has a round metal grounding post, while the fake has plastic. (The US plug isn’t grounded, but in other countries the lack of ground in the counterfeit could pose a safety hazard.)
The HP TouchPad charger has a very unusual cylindrical shape, which is striking if perhaps not practical. The charger twists apart, allowing the plug to be replaced for different countries. (It took me weeks to discover this feature.)
The Monoprice charger isn’t a USB charger, but instead has a 30-pin iPhone dock connector attached. It is a relatively large charger.
This charger is a counterfeit of the Apple UK iPhone charger. They’ve removed Apple from the text, but left Emerson Network Power, which I’m sure is not the actual manufacturer. The genuine Apple UK charger can be distinguished by a serial number inside the USB connector.
The Belkin charger eschews the minimal design styling of most chargers, with a roughly oval cross section, curves and ribs, and a cover over the USB port.
The KMS charger is unusual in providing 4 USB ports. It also gives off a blue glow while in use. The plug can be removed and replaced for use in different countries, similar to the iPad and HP TouchPad chargers. I couldn’t find any UL safety approval on this charger, but I did find a report of one catching fire.
The Motorola charger has the lowest listed power output, 850mA. The back of it has a holographic sticker (like a credit card), which may ward off counterfeiters, even though it’s unlikely for anyone to counterfeit this charger. I wonder though why Apple doesn’t use holograms or other anti-counterfeiting techniques, given the large number of counterfeit Apple chargers being sold.
Delivery of advertised power
Each charger has an advertised power output, but some chargers produce considerably more and some produce much less. Your device will take longer to charge, if the charger can’t put out enough power. This table shows each charger’s ability to deliver the rated power, based on my measurements of maximum power. While most chargers meet or exceed the power rating, there are some exceptions.
The counterfeit chargers perform extremely poorly, putting out a fraction of the expected power. Charging your device with one of these chargers will be a slow, frustrating experience. In particular, the counterfeit UK charger only produces a third of the expected power. Although the label claims the charger works on 100-240 volts, it’s clearly not designed to work on US power.
The iPad is a surprise, putting out less power than expected. Despite being nominally a 10 watt charger, the label says it provides 5.1V and 2.1A, which works out to 10.7 watts. However, the maximum power I measured is 10.1 watts (4.4 volts at 2.3 amps, as shown in the Power section below). Since the measured power is slightly less than advertised, it only gets four bolts.
In this section, I measure the quality of the power produced by the different chargers. I analyze it for voltage spikes, high frequency noise, and line-frequency ripple. The following table summarizes the results in three categories. Spikes indicates extremely brief large voltage spikes in the output, while Noise indicates high-frequency noise in the output, and Ripple indicates low-frequency (120 Hz) fluctuations in the output.
The following oscilloscope traces show the output signal (yellow) and frequency spectrum (orange). The left images provide high-frequency information on the output voltage. The right images show the low-frequency information on the output voltage.
The desired voltage graph is a flat, thin yellow line indicating totally smooth power. However, some factors mess this up. First, any ripple from the power line will show up as 5 sinusoidal peaks in the first (high-frequency) yellow line. High-frequency noise will widen the yellow line. Voltage spikes will appear as vertical spikes in the yellow line.
The plots also show the frequency spectrum in orange, from 0 at the left to 230 kHz at the right. The desired graph would have the orange spectrum near the bottom of the screen. Thus, the power quality exponentially gets worse as the orange line gets higher. The left (high frequency) spectrum generally shows noise at the switching frequency of the charger (and harmonics). The right (low frequency) spectrum typically shows spikes at multiples of 120 Hz, caused by ripple from the 60 Hz power.
The ripple is clearly visible as the waves in the yellow trace on the left and as the spikes (at 120 Hz and 240 Hz) in the orange trace on the right.
The iPhone charger performs extremely well at filtering out spikes and noise, the best of the chargers I measured. Apart from the 120 Hz spikes, the noise spectrum (orange) is flat and very low. The power quality is so good, I checked the results several times to make sure I wasn’t missing something.
The Samsung charger’s output has a lot more noise than the iPhone charger. This is visible in the thickness and jaggedness of the yellow output curves. The orange frequency spectrum on the left shows large peaks at harmonics of the switching frequency. The 120 Hz spike on the right is a bit lower than the iPhone charger, so the ripple filtering is a bit better.
The Samsung cube charger shows some noise in the output (yellow). The frequency spectrum shows wide peaks at multiples of the the switching frequency, about 90kHz. There’s some ripple.
The iPad charger almost eliminates the ripple; only a small blip is visible in the orange spectrum on the right. The noise level is low, although appreciably worse than the iPhone.
There’s no ripple visible in the HP charger spectrum on the right. The overall noise level is good.
The output from this counterfeit charger is a wall of noise. In order to fit the waveform in the display, I had to double the scale on the left and increase it by a factor of 5 on the right, so the yellow curve is actually much worse than it appears. On the left, note the huge ripple with massive high-frequency noise on top. This output is not something you want to feed into your phone.
The output from this charger is very noisy, as you can see from the thickness of the yellow line. Note that the frequency spectrum (left) has very tall but narrow spikes at harmonics of the 28kHz switching frequency, showing a lot of high-frequency noise. On the positive side, there is hardly any ripple.
This charger has very bad output. The large degree of ripple is visible in the waveform (yellow, left) and the very large spikes in the spectrum (orange, right). The thickness of the yellow waveform shows the large amount of high-frequency noise, which is also visible in the very high peaks in the spectrum (orange, left).
This counterfeit charger has so much noise in the output that I had to double the scale on the left to get it to fit. Note the very large spikes in the output (yellow). The spectrum (orange, left) is much higher everywhere, indicating noise at all frequencies. Surprisingly, it has only a moderate amount of ripple; the manufacturer seems to have done at least one thing right.
The Belkin charger does well at eliminating ripple, but has a lot of noise otherwise. The spectrum (orange, left) shows large peaks. The yellow output is wide, showing a lot of noise, combined with many large voltage spikes of about 1/3 volt.
The KMS charger has fairly good output, with a small peak in the spectrum (orange, left) at the switching frequency. It has no detectable ripple. However, it has many large voltage spikes in the output, over half a volt, as can be seen on the right.
The Motorola charger has a lot of spikes in the output (yellow). The spectrum (orange, left) shows high frequency noise at the switching frequencies. There’s a moderate amount of ripple (yellow, left and orange, right).
The quality of the output power is radically different between chargers. The counterfeit chargers are uniformly bad, with hardly any effort at filtering the output. The other chargers vary in quality with the iPhone charger setting the standard for noise-free power, but surprisingly poor filtering of ripple. The power quality is a key factor that affects the performance of chargers; spikes and noise are known to interfere with touchscreens.
In this section I look at the voltage and current output by the charger as the load increases. The first rating is Voltage Sag, which is the undesired drop in output voltage as the load increases. The second rating is Current Sag, which shows how the current fluctuates as load increases. Finally, Regulation shows the overall stability of the output from the charger.
The graphs in this section need a bit of explanation, which is provided in the diagram below. The voltage/current load curve shows the performance of the charger under different loads. Each point on the curve shows the current (X axis) and voltage (Y axis) produced by the charger under a particular load condition. Follow the yellow curve clockwise from the upper left to the lower left to see the effect of increasing load. The upper left point of the curve shows the voltage produced by the charger when there is no load on the charger. As the load increases, the charger is supposed to keep a constant voltage and increase the current (i.e. horizontal line), until it reaches the maximum power (upper right). If the load continues increasing, the charger switches to a constant current mode, dropping the voltage while continuing to provide the maximum current (i.e. vertical line). At the lower right, the charger has reached its shutdown point due to excessive load, and rapidly drops to no output in the lower left corner to avoid damage.
The output from the Apple iPhone charger is surprisingly non-constant under load. The charger starts off with 5.2 volts with no load, dropping to 4.6 volts as the load increases, resulting in the downwards slope of the top yellow line. As the load increases, the current keeps increasing, resulting in the slope of the right yellow line. Note however that the yellow line is relatively thin, so the regulation is pretty good at each point.
Note that because this charger has a high current output, this chart has a different current (horizontal) scale than most of the charts to fit the whole trace in the image. Stretch it horizontally to compare with other graphs.
For this charger, the voltage is approximately flat, except for a bump under no load (upper left) which is probably a measurement artifact. The vertical yellow line shows the current stays nearly constant as the load increases. The charger shows good voltage and current stability under changing load. The yellow line is a bit wider than the iPhone charger, showing a bit less regulation for a fixed load.
The voltage curve sags slightly under load. The right hand curve shows the current stays stable, but the line is moderately wide, showing a bit of weakness in regulation.
Similar to the iPhone charger, the iPad charger shows a lot of voltage sag. The voltage is about 5.1 V unloaded, dropping to 4.4 volts and 2.3 A (10.1 W) at the corner. Unlike the iPhone charger, the iPad charger has pretty good current stability. The regulation is solid, as shown by the narrowness of the yellow trace. Note the scale change due to the high current output.
I’m puzzled by the steep voltage sag on both the iPhone and iPad charger. Since the designers of the Apple charger went to a great deal of effort to build a high quality charger, I conclude they must not consider voltage sag worth worrying about. Or, more interestingly, maybe they built this sag as a feature for some reason. In any case, the chargers lose points on this.
Apple 5W USB Power Adapter
The charger has some voltage sag, but the current (vertical) is nice and constant. The yellow line is relatively thin, showing good regulation. Note the scale change due to the high current output.
This counterfeit charger shows extremely poor regulation, as shown by the very wide yellow line. It’s hard to fit a voltage-current curve to this picture. The amount of power supplied by this charger seems almost random.
The Monoprice charger shows reasonably straight voltage and current lines showing good constant voltage and current outputs. The vertical line shows some width and noise, suggesting the regulation isn’t totally stable.
For this charger, the upper line doesn’t get very far, showing that this charger doesn’t output much current. My suspicion is that it was only tested with 240 volts so it performs poorly with 120 volts, even though the label says it takes 100 to 240 volts. The width of the yellow line shows very poor regulation.
The output of this counterfeit charger is so poorly regulated that it’s hard to tell exactly what’s happening with the voltage and current. It looks like the voltage is roughly constant underneath all the noise.
The Belkin charger shows voltage sag as the current increases. In addition, the output is fairly noisy.
The KMS charger shows a lot of voltage sag as the load increases. In addition, the output is all over the place, showing very poor regulation, more like what I’d expect from a counterfeit charger. Note the scale change due to the high current output.
The Motorola charger shows a bit of voltage sag, but good current stability. The regulation is good but not perfect, as shown by the width of the yellow line. (The gaps in the vertical line are just measurement artifacts.) Note that the maximum current output of this charger is fairly low (as advertised).
So what charger should you spend your hard-earned money on? First, make sure the charger will work with your phone. for instance, newer iPhones only work with certain chargers. Second, don’t buy a counterfeit charger; the price is great, but it’s not worth risking your expensive device or your safety. Beyond that, it’s your decision on how much quality is worth versus price, and I hope the data here helps you make a decision.
P.S. How about some teardowns?
My previous iPhone charger and fake charger teardowns were surprisingly popular, but if you were hoping for teardowns on the full set of chargers, you’ll need to wait for a future blog post. I haven’t torn the chargers apart yet; if I need to take more measurements, I don’t want to have just a pile of parts. But I do have some preview pictures to hold you over until my teardown article.
The above picture shows the internals of a counterfeit Apple iPhone cube charger. The two boards stack to form the compact cube shape. This charger blatantly tries to pass as a genuine Apple charger; unlike the “Designed by California” charger, this one exactly copies the “Designed by Apple in California” text from the real charger. Note the very simple circuitry. there are no components on the other side of the board, no controller IC, and very little filtering. Also look at the terrible mounting of the transistor on the front right; clearly the build quality of this charger is poor. Finally, note the overall lack of insulation; this charger wouldn’t meet UL safety standards and could easily short out. But on the plus side, this charger only cost a couple dollars.
The above 2 charger is notable for its low-profile design; it’s about as thin as you can make a charger and still fit the power prongs and the USB port. The transformer is very short to fit into this charger. Like the previous charger, it uses a very simple circuit, has little filtering, and almost no safety insulation.
Finally, the above pictures show the internals of the Samsung cube charger, which has circuit boards packed with tiny components and is much more advanced than the counterfeits (although slightly less complex than the Apple charger). Despite being very similar to the Apple charger on the outside, the Samsung charger uses an entirely different design and circuitry internally. One interesting design feature is the filter capacitors fit through the cut-out holes in the secondary circuit board, allowing the large filter capacitors to fit in the charger.
Notes and references
 For an explanation of how the noisy output from cheap chargers messes up touchscreens, see Noise Wars: Projected Capacitance Strikes Back.
 The charger selection may seem slightly eccentric; it is based on chargers I had previously acquired, chargers I could obtain at a reasonable price, chargers supplied by Gary F. and Anthony H. (thanks, guys!), and some counterfeit chargers for comparison.
 TI has an interesting new design for a 10 watt inch-cube charger. With this design a tablet charger could be as small as the iPhone charger.
 The cheap chargers all use a “ringing choke converter” circuit, which coincidentally is the same power supply topology used by the Apple II. These chargers use an extremely simple feedback mechanism in place of the control IC in higher-quality chargers. See a comic-book explanation or a technical explanation for details.
 Since the input AC has a frequency of 60 Hertz, you might wonder why the ripple in the output is 120 Hertz. The diode bridge converts the 60 Hz AC input to 120 Hz pulsed DC, as shown in the diagram below. The pulses are smoothed out with filter capacitors before being fed into the switching circuit, but if the filtering isn’t sufficient the output may show some 120 Hz ripple.
 The chargers use specific voltages on the data pins to indicate the charger type to the device being charged. Because of this, an “incorrect” charger may be rejected by an iPhone with the message “Charging is not supported with this accessory”. Under the USB standard, a charger should short the two data pins together to indicate that it’s a “dedicated” charger and not a real USB device. However, companies such as Apple, HP, and Sony have their own proprietary nonstandard techniques. The following table summarizes the voltages that appear on the D and D- lines for different chargers, and how the D and D- lines are configured internally.
|HP TouchPad 2A||2.8||2.7||yes||250||300||n/a||n/a|
Most of this data is based on Maxim USB Battery Charger Detectors, Adafruit’s The mysteries of Apple device charging, TouchPad’s USB Cable, XDA forum (Samsung), and TPS2511 USB Dedicated Charging Port Controller and Current Limiting Power Switch datasheet. The Apple 2A (i.e. iPad) information is a new result from my measurements. For details on USB charging protocols, see my references in my earlier posting.
Amusingly, semiconductor manufacturers have recently introduced chips that allow chargers to sequentially pretend to be different proprietary chargers until they trick the device into accepting the charger. It seems crazy that companies (such as Apple) design incompatible chargers, and then chip companies invent schemes to work around these incompatibilities in order to build universally compatible chargers. Two example chips are the TI TPS 2511 chip, and SMSC’s USC1001 controller, which pretends to be nine different charger types.
 If you’ve wondered why some chargers cause the iPhone to give a “Charging not supported with this accessory” error, Silicon based annoyance reduction made easy describes how devices use proprietary protocols to limit the chargers they will work with.
 For the efficiency analysis I use 12 cents / kilowatt-hour as a typical residential energy price, which I got from US Energy Information Administration table 5.3.
 The official no-load charger star ratings are discussed at Meeting 30 mW standby in mobile phone chargers.
 There are many standards for energy consumption; see 5 W Cellular Phone CCCV (Constant Current Constant Voltage) AC-DC Adapter. For Energy Star ratings, a 5W charger must have under.5W no-load consumption, and 63% efficiency under load. A 10W charger must have under.75W no-load consumption, and 70% efficiency.
 Because switching power supplies use power in irregular waveforms, I used a complex setup to measure power consumption. I measured the AC input voltage and current with an oscilloscope. The oscilloscope’s math functions multiplied the voltage and current at each instant to compute the instantaneous power, and then computed the average power over time. For safety and to avoid vaporizing the oscilloscope I used an isolation transformer. My measurements are fairly close to Apple’s, which is reassuring.
You might wonder why I didn’t just use a Kill A Watt power monitor, which performs the same instantaneous voltage current process internally. Unfortunately it doesn’t have the resolution for the small power consumptions I’m measuring: it reports 0.3W for the Apple iPhone charger, and 0.0W for many of the others. Ironically, after computing these detailed power measurements, I simply measured the input current with a multimeter, multiplied by 115 volts, and got almost exactly the same results for vampire power.
 The spike, noise, and ripple measurements come from the oscilloscope traces. The Spikes measurement is based on the maximum peak-to-peak voltage on the high frequency trace (the low frequency trace yields almost identical results). The Noise measurement is based on the RMS voltage on the high-frequency trace, and Ripple is based on the maximum dB measured in the low-frequency spectrum. These measurements appear on the right in the traces.
 In the power quality section, the high-frequency (left) images show 40 milliseconds of the waveform in yellow, and the frequency spectrum up to 234 kHz in orange. The low-frequency (right) images show 1 second of the output voltage in yellow and the frequency spectrum up to 600 Hz in orange. Because the frequency spectrum is measured in dBm, it is logarithmic; every division higher indicates 20 dB which is 10 times the voltage and 100 times the power.
 The chargers use a design called constant-voltage, constant-current (CVCC), since they provide a constant voltage (and increasing current) up to the maximum load and then a constant current (and decreasing voltage) if the load continues to increase.  The Apple 3GS Environmental Report gives some efficiency measurements for the Apple USB Power Adapter. It lists 0.23W no-load power and 75% efficiency. These values are reasonably close to my measurements of 0.195W no-load consumption and 73.6% efficiency.
 Measuring these curves was a bit tricky. I used a NTE2382 power MOSFET transistor as a variable load, manually varying the gate bias to generate the load curve. The transistor needed a large heat sink to dissipate 10 watts. A more complex dynamic load circuit is described here, but the simple circuit was sufficient for me.
The graphs were generated using the X-Y mode on the oscilloscope, with the load voltage as Y and the current as X. I used a.12Ω current sense resistor to measure the load current. This works out to 1/6 amp load current per division for the 20mV/div traces (most of them), and 5/12 amp load current per division for the 50mV/div traces (the high-current devices).
Note that increasing load corresponds to a decreasing resistance across the output: the upper left has infinite resistance (no load), the lower left has zero resistance (short circuit), and the resistance decreases in between. Since the power (in watts) is voltage current, the maximum power is in the upper right corner, approximately 4W in this case. The load resistance can be computed by Ohm’s law, e.g. middle of the upper curve: 5 V /.4 A = 12.5Ω, upper right corner 5 V /.8 A = 6.25 ohms. Middle of the right hand curve: 2.5 V /.8 A = 3Ω, overload point =.5 V /.8 A =.6Ω.
 Most of these chargers aren’t made by the companies that sell them, and there are some interesting facts about the manufacturers. The manufacturers of the chargers can be looked up from the UL certification number. The oblong Samsung is made in China by Korean RFTech, a manufacturer of mobile phone products. The Samsung cube is made in China by Korean power supply manufacturer Dong Yang EP. The HP charger is made by Foxlink, who also makes the iPad charger for Apple. The counterfeit chargers are made by anonymous Chinese manufacturers, despite what they claim on the labels. The Monoprice is made by Golden Profit Electronics (formerly ShaYao Electric Factory Three. no word on what happened to factories One and Two). The Belkin charger is manufactured by the obscure company Mobiletec of Taiwan. The KMS charger doesn’t give any clues as to the manufacturer, and I can’t identify KMS as a company. The Motorola charger is built by Astec (now part of Emerson Network Power). Interestingly, Astec’s big break was manufacturing power supplies for the Apple II, as I discuss in my article on the Apple II power supply.
Apple uses a dizzying variety of manufacturers for their chargers. The iPhone charger (A1265) is made by Flextronics, the UK charger (A1299) is made by Emerson Network Power (except the one I have is counterfeit), the iPad charger (A1357) is made by Foxlink Technologies, and the Magsafe (ADP-85) charger (not discussed in this article) is made by Delta Electronics. The A1385 iPhone charger often comes with the iPhone 5 and looks identical to the A1265 I measured, but is manufactured by Emerson Network Power instead of Flextronics. I am told that by using multiple manufacturers, Apple has more negotiating leverage, since they can easily switch manufacturers at any time if they’re not happy with the price or quality.
Confusingly, Foxlink (Taiwan), Foxconn (Taiwan), and Flextronics (Singapore) are all manufacturers for Apple with similar names. Foxlink (the name for Cheng Uei Precision Industry) and Foxconn (the name for Hon Hai Precision Industry) are entirely independent companies aside from the fact that the chairmen of both companies are brothers and the companies do a lot of business with each other (statement, Foxlink annual report). Foxconn is the company with continuing controversy over employee treatment. Foxconn and Flextronics are the world’s #1 and #2 largest electronics manufacturing companies according to the Circuits Assembly Top 50.
The Best Fast iPhone Chargers for 2023
Want to charge your iPhone more quickly? Check out our favorite fast iPhone chargers to top your battery off in a flash.
I love portable technology—if you can put it in a or a bag, I’m probably into it. I’ve covered phones and tablets of all shapes and sizes, and reviewed everything from game consoles to laptops in my decade-plus career. Prior to joining PCMag, I wrote articles for Android Authority, How-To Geek, MUO, New Atlas, Tom’s Hardware, and plenty of other tech publications.
(Credit: Native Union)
No matter which Phone you have, you’re probably all too familiar with the dinky 5W adapter that takes hours to fully charge your phone’s battery. The good news is that you can fully power up in less than half the usual time with the right fast charger. Check out our top picks, followed by what you need to know about fast charging your iPhone.
Recommended by Our Editors
Best for Guaranteed Compatibility
Apple 20W USB-C Power Adapter
Apple’s 20W USB-C Adapter is understated, relatively affordable, and guaranteed to work well with your iPhone. Apple sells it as a standalone item, so you might need to pick up a USB-C-to-Lightning cable separately if you don’t have one.
Best for Charging on the Go
Anker 511 Charger (Nano)
Looking for a fast, inexpensive iPhone charger that easily fits in your or bag? This 20W charger is about the same size as the standard 5W iPhone adapter but charges your phone three times as quickly because of its support for the Quick Charge and Power Delivery protocols. Like all fast iPhone chargers, it requires a USB-C-to-Lightning cable, which you need to buy separately.
Google 30W USB-C Power Charger
We know this seems like a strange pick, but we firmly believe Google’s power adapter is a good choice for iPhone owners. Aside from its affordable price, the charger has a premium build quality and supports maximum charging speeds of up to 30W. It’s a good all-around power adapter for iPhones and iPads, plus can deliver the fastest charging speeds for iPhone 14 Pro Max owners.
Best for International Travel
Native Union Smart Charger PD 20W
Native Union’s Smart Charger PD is ideal for travelers because it includes adapters for use in the EU, UK, and US. Its 20W USB-C PD port can quickly charge your iPhone with a USB-C-to-Lightning cable or even a MagSafe charger. There’s also a USB-A port that maxes out at 12W. Like most of the fast iPhone adapters on this list, the Smart Charger PD doesn’t come with cables, but Native Union sells some of our favorite durable USB-C-to-Lightning cables.
Nimble Wally Mini Plus Wall Charger
If you’re looking for an inexpensive charger made from responsibly sourced materials, the Nimble Wally Mini Plus Wall Charger is a good bet. It uses 72% recycled plastic, ships without without plastic packaging, and includes a postage-paid bag to recycle your old tech. It has USB-A and USB-C ports and supports PD 3.0.
Anker 30W PIQ 3.0 GaN Wall Charger
With a maximum output of 30W, this Anker adapter can quickly charge any iPhone. It’s also super thin, which makes it a good choice for those hard-to-use outlets behind nightstands and desks.
Does Your iPhone Support Fast Charging?
iPhones have long supported faster charging with a 12W iPad adapter, and Apple improved on that rate by introducing fast charging via USB Power Delivery (PD) with the release of the iPhone 8 in 2017. Most newer iPhones, such as the iPhone 13 and iPhone 14, can charge at between 25W and 27W.
Apple stopped including power adapters with iPhones back in 2020, so you need to either use an old (and potentially slow) power brick you already own or pick up a new one from our list above. Make sure your new adapter supports the fastest charging speeds possible.
What You Need for Fast Charging Your iPhone
You must keep a few things in mind when shopping for a fast charger. First and foremost, you need to make sure it supports PD. An adapter with a USB-C port is also essential for the fastest charging speeds.
Because Apple only began shipping USB-C-to-Lightning cables with the iPhone 12 in 2020, people with older phones likely need to buy one from Apple or a trusted third party to get the fastest charging speeds. This is an area where you don’t want to skimp, as we’ve seen some unintended consequences from using off-brand cables. For most people, Apple’s USB-C-to-Lightning cable (Opens in a new window) (starting at 19) does the trick, but we also like some cables from reputable brands such as Native Union and Nomad.
Next, take time to assess your needs. Do you frequently charge multiple devices simultaneously? If so, buying a charger with multiple ports probably makes sense. Do you have Airpods or an Apple Watch to charge? Look into a wireless charging pad (but expect slower speeds).
When multiple ports are in the mix, it’s important to check the adapter’s total power output and each port’s power output. Watch out for underpowered ports that lead to longer charge times.
Should You Buy a GaN Charger?
The majority of chargers on the market use silicon semiconductors. Gallium nitride (GaN) is a relatively new alternative to silicon that offers a lot of benefits: GaN chargers are smaller, more efficient, and require fewer components than silicon chargers. They’re also more expensive. Ultimately, traditional silicon chargers are fine for most people. If you’re looking for the absolute slimmest option on the market, however, it’s likely to be a GaN charger.
What About Wireless Charging and MagSafe?
If your nightstand is cluttered with Airpods, Apple Watch, and iPhone cables, it’s time to streamline your power routine with a wireless charging pad. We assembled a list of our favorite wireless charging stations for Apple products, with phone-only and multi-device options at various prices. Several of them support fast charging.
iPhone 12, 13, and 14 models also offer MagSafe as a faster alternative to Qi wireless charging. MagSafe allows you to wirelessly charge your device at up to 15W. Check out our favorite MagSafe chargers, but remember that you won’t get the same 27W speeds as with a wired charger and the right adapter.
Steven Winkelman contributed to this article.